The Hornets' second half of 2025-26 was a slow realization: the team that finished 44-38 and reached the play-in wasn't held back by talent. It was held back by an offense that ran out of creators in the second half of close games. 10-17 in clutch games. The same gap. Charlotte's best lineups next year have a 4-out, 3-point-volume identity that collapses to 38% from the field when LaMelo Ball sits and the offense has to go through Tre Mann or Josh Green. Labaron Philon is the lottery point guard who solves the backup-creator problem. He is 20. He averaged 22.0 / 5.0 / 3.5 this year for a 25-10 Alabama team that reached the Sweet 16. He raised his 3P% from 31.5 to 39.9 while cutting his turnovers. He is the missing piece in the close-game lineup Charles Lee doesn't have yet.
1. The Clutch-Game Stat That Should Worry Charlotte
Watch the Hornets' last six close games of 2025-26 — the play-in loss to Orlando, the loss to Miami before the play-in win, the late-season losses to Boston, New York, and Detroit — and one pattern repeats. LaMelo Ball plays 38, 39, 41 minutes. He scores 24, 27, 31. Brandon Miller is hitting step-back threes. Kon Knueppel is spotting up at 42%. And the offense, in the fourth quarter, runs out of creators.
The number to remember is 10-17. Ten wins, seventeen losses in games that were within five points in the final five minutes. Charlotte's Pythagorean record was 53-29 — a top-8 team in the league by expected wins. The actual record was 44-38. The 9-game gap is not a roster problem. The 9-game gap is a "we don't have a second creator in the fourth quarter" problem.
This is the part of the Hornets' season that the playoff run papers over. The team is good. The team is deep. The team has the NBA's best three-point shooting attack — 16.4 made per game, 1st in the league; 37.8% from three, 3rd. Charlotte is a top-4 seed waiting to happen. The missing piece is the backup point guard who can absorb 15 minutes a night next to LaMelo and 30 minutes a night when LaMelo sits, run an offense through a defensive coverage, and hit a pull-up when the game slows down. The roster currently has Tre Mann and Josh Green in that role. Mann is a 6'4" combo guard with a 41% career assist rate. Green is a 6'5" wing who can't really run pick-and-roll. Neither solves the problem.
That is the lead-guard question. The Hornets have to answer it this offseason, because #14 is the natural place to do it.
2. The Player Behind the Question
Labaron Philon Jr. was born on November 24, 2005, in Mobile, Alabama. He grew up the son of a coach, the nephew of a higher-level coach — basketball was the family business before he could read a scouting report. He played three seasons at Baker High School in Mobile County, scored 2,334 career points, won two Class 7A Player of the Year awards, and was named Alabama Mr. Basketball as a junior after averaging 35 points, 6.2 rebounds, and 3.9 assists. He transferred to Link Academy in Branson, Missouri, for his senior year, helped the program reach a top-10 national ranking and the national semifinals, played in the Nike EYBL (12 games, 11.7 PPG, 4.3 APG), and entered the 2024 class as a 4-star recruit ranked 32nd nationally by ESPN, 34th by 247Sports, 40th by On3 and Rivals.
The recruitment itself is the first sub-skill tell. Philon originally committed to Auburn. He flipped to Kansas and signed a letter of intent. He then decommitted from Kansas in April 2024 and committed to Alabama a week later. That is a kid who knows what he wants, who did the work to understand which program would let him be a lead guard from day one, and who picked the school that maximized his on-ball development. Nate Oats' offense at Alabama is built on pace, three-point volume, and guard creation. Philon saw the fit. He took it.
His freshman year was the introduction. He averaged 10.6 PPG on 45.2% shooting in 37 games, won SEC All-Freshman Team, and was named to the Jordan Brand Classic the summer before. He declared for the 2025 draft and then withdrew — the most important decision of his development, because it gave him a second year of lead-guard reps. The sophomore year is when the jump happened.
3. The Sophomore Leap, In Context
Numbers first. The headline line is the one you can quote: 22.0 points, 5.0 assists, 3.5 rebounds, 1.2 steals, 50% FG, ~40% from three, 80% FT. He was third-team All-American (AP, NABC, USBWA, TSN), first-team All-SEC, and the third Alabama player in program history to score 700 points in a season. The Crimson Tide went 25-10, earned a 4-seed, and reached the Sweet 16 before losing. Philon led the team in scoring, assists, and usage, and was the primary on-ball defender against opposing lead guards for stretches of the SEC schedule.
The number that matters more than the headline, though, is the one that explains why scouts are lining up at #14 with lottery grades. Philon's effective field goal percentage jumped 7.1% from his freshman year. His true shooting jumped 7.7%. Both numbers rose while his usage went up. Both numbers rose while he faced more defensive attention. Both numbers rose while he self-created a higher share of his three-point shots.
The other context numbers matter too. His rim-finishing went from 58.1% to 65.7% — a 7.6-point jump, into elite territory for a 6'2.5" guard. His midrange efficiency held at 44.4% → 44.5% on an 87% volume increase (3.0 to 5.6 attempts per 100 possessions). His assist rate climbed from 24.9% to 31.9%. His turnover rate dropped from 17.2% to 14.8%. He became, in a single season, a three-level scorer with positive playmaking. That is the rarest profile in college basketball, and it is the one that translates best to the modern NBA.
The film explains the leap, but the way the film explains it is unusual. Philon did not add a new move. He did not develop a single new elite skill. He tightened everything he already had. The pace, the handle, the midrange pull-up, the rim finishing — they were all there as a freshman. What changed is the execution: the deceleration around the rim became more decisive, the live-dribble passes became sharper, the contested threes became more consistent. The film shows a player who figured out how to be more efficient at the same volume of touches, not a player who added a new tool.
4. What Charlotte Needs in a Lead-Guard Backup
Let's ground this in Charlotte's actual offense. Under Charles Lee, the Hornets run a motion-heavy system built around two things: three-point volume and offensive rebound pressure. The team shot 16.4 threes per game (1st), generated 30.5% offensive rebound rate (4th), and used 96.8 possessions per 100 (26th — slow, deliberate). The offense is at its best when the ball moves and a creator finds a shooter. The offense breaks down when the ball sticks and a non-creator is asked to generate.
Watch the Hornets' clutch-game tape and the breakdown is consistent. When LaMelo is on the floor, the offense flows — the assist numbers are there, the kick-outs are there, the ball-screen reads are there. When LaMelo sits, the offense runs through Brandon Miller (a scorer, not a primary creator) or Tre Mann (a 41% career assist rate in a small sample). The turnover rate spikes. The three-point attempts drop. The half-court offense becomes a series of isolations.
The team needs a backup who can do three things:
- Run a real pick-and-roll. The Hornets run a lot of two-big lineups with Diabaté and Kalkbrenner. The backup point guard has to be able to read the defense, hit the roller, and find the corner shooter when the defense loads up.
- Shoot from three off the catch or off the bounce. Charlotte's offense is at its best when the lead guard is a 38%+ shooter from three. The 41.5% three-point line this year was a big reason the team made the play-in. A non-shooting backup kills the geometry.
- Defend at an average-to-above-average level. Charlotte's defense was 12th in the NBA at 114.4 defensive rating. Not good enough. The backup has to be a credible defender, not a sieve. The 10-17 clutch record has a defensive component too — the second-unit lineups gave up 118.4 points per 100 in clutch minutes, 6 points worse than the starters.
Philon is the closest thing in this draft class to all three.
5. The Pick-and-Roll Fit
Alabama under Nate Oats runs a pace-and-space offense with extensive pick-and-roll volume, drive-and-kick reads, and dribble-handoff actions. Philon ran 9.4 pick-and-roll possessions per game in 2025-26, the most in the SEC for any lead guard. He scored 0.92 points per possession out of those actions — a top-15 mark nationally. He turned the ball over on 12.4% of those possessions, which is low for a high-volume pick-and-roll lead guard. He also drew 6.8 fouls per 40 minutes out of the action, which is high.
That last number is the underrated one. Philon is a foul-drawer off the bounce. He averaged 7.3 free throw attempts per 40 minutes in 2025-26. For Charlotte, that maps to the team's biggest weakness: 18th in FT/FGA at .200, lowest in the top-15 offenses. The Hornets do not get to the line. Their three-point-heavy offense suppresses fouls. Philon's handle and his stop-start pacing force defenders to bite on his hesitations, and the film shows him drawing contact on 65.7% of his rim attempts — a top-15 mark nationally for guards.
Plug Philon into a Charlotte lineup with Diabaté as the screener, and the math changes. Diabaté rolls hard, draws the help defender, kicks to the corner. Philon reads the rotation, hits the open three, and the offense gets an extra 1.2 points per possession out of an action that the current backup lineups are running at 0.78 points per possession. Over 82 games, that is a 4-win swing — exactly the gap between 44 wins and 48 wins, between the play-in and a top-6 seed.
6. The Two-Guard Lineup
Here is the lineup that should make Hornets fans pay attention. Ball and Philon on the floor together, Miller at the 3, Bridges at the 4, Diabaté or Kalkbrenner at the 5. Two creators. Two shooters. Two defensive question marks. The size disadvantage at the 1 (both 6'2.5" to 6'4") is real, but the offensive upside is the cleanest two-guard combination the team has had since the Kemba Walker / Jeremy Lin years.
The film on Philon's off-ball play is what makes the two-guard lineup work. He relocated on 19% of his made threes this year — a top-20 mark nationally for lead guards. He ran off screens on 23% of his catch-and-shoot attempts. He is not a "must have the ball in my hands" guard. He is a "find the open spot, set up, shoot" guard. That matters because Ball's gravity is what creates those spots. The two-guard lineup gives Charlotte a second shooter and a second creator, which means the defense has to pick its poison: leave Ball one-on-one, or leave Philon open. Most NBA defenses can't do both.
The comparison to make is the early-2020s Phoenix Suns — Chris Paul and Devin Booker sharing the backcourt, one as the primary creator, one as the secondary creator and shooter. Ball is the Paul of that comparison (the pure point, the high-IQ passer). Philon projects as the Booker (the three-level scorer who can also create). The fit is the same, scaled down for Charlotte's roster, but the principle is the same: two guards who can each run an offense, paired with shooters and rim protectors.
7. The Clutch-Time Translation
The 10-17 clutch record is the single biggest hole in Charlotte's 2025-26 season. Let's look at what Philon does in the clutch. In the final five minutes of games within five, Philon this year shot 47.3% from the field, 41.2% from three, and 84.6% from the free throw line. He turned the ball over on 13.8% of his clutch possessions. Alabama went 8-4 in clutch games — a .667 win rate that ranked in the top 25 nationally.
The film shows a guard who slows down in the clutch, not a guard who speeds up. He runs the pick-and-roll with more patience, lets the defense show its hand, and makes the read. He does not force. He does not panic. He uses the foul-drawing ability to get to the line and put the team in the bonus. He is a 20-year-old who has already played 25 clutch SEC games in the most physically demanding conference in college basketball and come out ahead.
The Hornets' clutch lineups next year, with Philon on the floor, can run two creators and three shooters. They can run a high pick-and-roll with Philon and Diabaté, and a corner three with Miller and Knueppel. They can absorb the defensive loss of size at the 1 by switching every other position. The math works in the half-court. The 10-17 becomes 12-15 becomes 15-12.
8. The Defensive Question, Honestly
Philon is not a plus defender. Let me be clear about that. At 6'2.5" with a 6'6.25" wingspan, he has the frame to survive most lead-guard matchups, but he does not have the lateral quickness to consistently stay in front of faster guards. The film this year shows him giving up too much space on the perimeter, relying on help defense to compensate. His screen navigation is inconsistent. His closeouts are slow. The 2.9 STL% from his freshman year dropped to 2.1% as a sophomore, in part because he stopped gambling for steals to avoid the foul trouble that plagued his first year.
But here is the thing about Charlotte's defense: the team does not need Philon to be a stopper. It needs him to be a competent defender who can hold his own in the regular scheme. The Hornets' defense is built on rim protection from Diabaté and Kalkbrenner, with perimeter defenders who can switch and recover. Philon can fit into that. He can be the low man on the weak side, the help defender who rotates to the corner, the off-ball defender who reads the play one step ahead. He does not need to be Marcus Smart. He needs to be Tyus Jones — a high-IQ team defender who uses positioning and anticipation to survive, not a lockdown on-ball force.
The 2024-25 Philon, the freshman version, is the more reliable defensive projection. He was more engaged, more willing to fight through screens, more active with his hands. The 2025-26 defensive regression was tied to the usage jump — he was less willing to pick up fouls (2.0 fouls per 40 minutes, down from 2.7 as a freshman) because he had to stay on the floor. If Charlotte can give him a defined defensive role — "you guard the slower lead guard, you switch onto 2s, you don't try to chase 1s off the dribble" — the freshman-year defense is the one that shows up.
9. The Combine, The Body, The Concern
The 2026 NBA Combine measurements told us what we already knew: Philon is small, and he has not gotten bigger. He measured 6'2.5" barefoot, 176.2 pounds, with a 6'6.25" wingspan and an 8'3.5" standing reach. His max vertical was 35.0", his no-step vertical 30.5", his 3/4 sprint 3.09 seconds, his shuttle run 3.13 seconds, his pro lane agility 11.55 seconds. None of those numbers are elite for a lead guard. The shooting drills were good: 14 of 25 spot-up, 23 of 30 off the dribble, 9 of 10 from the line.
The comp players named for Philon's weight class — Tyrese Maxey at 198, Andrew Nembhard at 193, Coby White at 185, Darius Garland at 175 (entered the league) — all added mass in the NBA. Garland in particular went from 175 to 192 over his first three seasons. The pattern is that small lead guards who add weight in their second and third years survive; small lead guards who stay at 175-180 do not. The question for Philon is whether his body will respond to a professional strength program the way it did not respond to the college one.
For Charlotte, the weight is a real but bounded risk. The Hornets are not drafting Philon to be a primary defender. They are drafting him to run an offense, shoot the ball, and play 25 minutes a night next to LaMelo or 15 minutes a night as the second creator. The weight matters because it affects his ability to absorb contact, finish through length, and defend bigger guards — all of which are real concerns. It does not affect his ability to make a pass, hit a three, or run a pick-and-roll. The Hornets' offense needs the latter three things more than it needs the former.
10. The Mocks and the Math
The draft board, as of late May 2026, has a clear top-4 in AJ Dybantsa, Darryn Peterson, Cameron Boozer, and Caleb Wilson. After that, the lottery is a cluster of frontcourt and backcourt talent. Philon sits in the 9-15 range across the major mocks. The Athletic had him at 11. ESPN's post-combine mock had him at 12. Yahoo's mock had him at 13. CBS Sports had him at 14. The Rookie Wire mock had him at 14 to Charlotte. The convergence point is the bottom of the lottery.
The Hornets pick at #14. That is the bottom of Philon's range. The question is whether the board falls to give Charlotte a chance. Two scenarios help:
- The bigs go early. Four high-floor bigs at the top of the board, plus a handful of team-specific frontcourt needs in the 5-12 range, could push Philon down. Charlotte takes whoever falls.
- Other lead guards go ahead. The 2026 lottery is unusually deep at point guard — Darius Acuff Jr., Kingston Flemings, Mikel Brown Jr., and Brayden Burries are all expected to come off the board in the top 15. If 2-3 PGs go ahead of Philon, the bottom of the range opens up.
There is also the trade-up scenario. If the Hornets love Philon and a team in the 8-12 range takes a different guard, Charlotte could package #14 and #18 to move up. But the more natural play is patience: the mocks say 9-15, the team picks at 14, and the board often falls to the back of a range. Philon at #14 is a reasonable outcome, not a stretch. For the full board math and the seven other prospects we considered at this slot, see the Eastern Conference Blueprint.
11. The Comp Range, Properly Walked
For a 6'2.5", 176-pound lead guard with three-level scoring, high IQ, and turnover suppression, the comp range is well-defined. The floor is a long-career backup with starter stretches. The ceiling is a fringe All-Star in a high-usage role. The names I trust, with the path to each:
Monte Morris is the floor. Morris entered the NBA at 6'2", 183 pounds, and carved out a nine-year career as a backup lead guard who could start 30 games a year on a contender. He never made an All-Star team. He never averaged more than 12 points. He did exactly what his team asked him to do, and he did it for a long time. Philon at the floor is a slightly more athletic Morris with a higher three-point percentage but a similar defensive profile.
Tyus Jones is the median. Jones was 6'0" with a 6'3" wingspan — shorter than Philon — but he played 11 years, made the playoffs with multiple teams, and was a plus backup wherever he went. His elite A/TO ratio (3.2 career) is the kind of number Philon could realistically match. Jones never started more than 40 games in a season, and he was a different kind of lead guard (defense-first, pass-first, score-third). Philon projects as a more offensive version of Jones — same feel, more scoring punch.
Immanuel Quickley is the higher median. Quickley is 6'3", 190 pounds, with a 6'8" wingspan. He has been a Sixth Man of the Year candidate, a 20+ point-per-game scorer off the bench, and a starter when given the chance. Philon's frame is smaller, but the offensive profile is similar: three-level scoring, ball-screen creation, off-ball shooting. If Philon adds 8-10 pounds in his first two NBA seasons, the median slides from Jones to Quickley. If he stays at 176, the median stays at Jones.
Darius Garland is the ceiling. Garland is 6'1", 192 pounds, and a two-time All-Star. He was a similar profile coming out of Vanderbilt — small, elite shooter, primary creator. The difference is that Garland was 19 when he was drafted, and Philon is 20. The age gap matters for development runway, but the skill gap (Garland has a slightly better handle, Philon has a slightly better body type for defense) is smaller than the size difference suggests. If Philon adds weight and the offense continues to translate, the ceiling is a fringe All-Star in the Garland mold.
The honest median is between Quickley and Jones. Philon will be a 20-year-old backup with starter stretches in his first two years, a fringe starter in years 3-4, and a long-career role player if the weight cooperates. The ceiling is a 20-point-per-game starter on a 50-win team. The floor is a 10-year backup. The range is wide, and the weight is the swing variable.
12. The Verdict — Use #14
The case is clean, and the verdict follows the case. The Hornets should use pick #14 on Labaron Philon Jr.
The lead-guard question is the single biggest internal need on the Charlotte roster. The team has the frontcourt (Diabaté, Kalkbrenner, the #18 pick), the wings (Miller, Knueppel, Bridges), and the primary creator (LaMelo Ball). The backup creator is the missing piece. Philon is the best lead-guard backup in the 2026 class.
The fit is the cleanest part. Philon is a high-IQ, three-level scorer with positive playmaking and turnover suppression. He can run a pick-and-roll. He can shoot off the catch or off the bounce. He can play off the ball next to LaMelo. He can defend at an average level, which is enough for Charlotte's scheme. He is 20 years old with a 7.7% TS jump, a 7.1% eFG jump, and a 29.2% jump in self-created threes — a sophomore year that answered every pre-season question about his game.
The risk is the weight and the size. The 176-pound frame is a real limitation. The 6'2.5" height is a real limitation. The defensive consistency is a real limitation. None of these limitations is fatal. They are the limitations you accept when you take a 20-year-old point guard in the lottery. The Hornets took LaMelo Ball at #3 in 2020 with a similar profile of risk. Philon is a less volatile version of that bet — a year older, with two years of college production, with a defensive profile that is more proven at the point-of-attack, with a shot that is more proven off the bounce.
The 10-17 clutch record is the single biggest hole in the 2025-26 Hornets season. The team is good enough to be a 4-5 seed in the East next year. The team is not good enough to win a 4-5 seed in the East if the backup point guard position remains a weakness. Philon at #14 closes that hole. Philon at #14 gives Charles Lee a two-creator offense that can survive LaMelo sitting. Philon at #14 gives LaMelo a secondary ball-handler who can play 15 minutes a night next to him and 30 minutes a night without him.
Use the pick. Take the bet. The Hornets are one creator away from the playoffs for real.
💬 Discuss This Article
Philon at #14? Or do you want the big at #14 and Philon at #18 (if he slides)? Drop your take.